Also in 1995 I was active in The Thing: an international net-community of artists and art-related projects that was started in 1991 by my friend and next door neighbor at the time, Wolfgang Staehle. The Thing was launched as a mailbox system accessible over the telephone network in New York feeding a Bulletin Board System (BBS) in 1991 before their website was launched in 1995 on the World Wide Web. I particularly was exchanging theoretically-charged emails with Peter von Brandenburg (aka Blackhawk) there as early as 1992 while I was still working on my Computer Virus Project at the Centre International de Réflexion sur l’Avenir at the Fondation Claude-Nicolas Ledoux in La Saline Royale d’Arc-et-Senans in the Jura department of the Bourgogne-Franche-Comté region of eastern France.
Arc-et-Senans, and nearby Arbois, were my first locations where I worked and lived in France, between 1991 and 1993, and I thank the people there profoundly for their hospitality. Especially the curator Francois Cheval, who brought me there for an extended artist-in-residence at the Louis Pasteur Atelier in Arbois and the Saline royale d’Arc-et-Senans. There I created my first artistic computer virus code that I used for my Computer Virus Project I paintings (some mentioned in the text). This work was a reflection on my personal experiences of risk and loss with the AIDS epidemic.
Now, in 2023, Kimberley Palsat (my wonderful Orbis Tertius Press editor) and I have given the text a light dusting and small nips and tucks as we wish to maintain the historical validity of the work. The Lobster font used for the chapter headings and the use of the colours pink and blue in the text are the only new significant formal changes. (See page design example just below.)
I perhaps need not mention that the text was written well before the current avalanche of AI algorithms used to produce large language model (LLM) activities that use deep learning and large data sets to understand and generate new content. Also well before woke alertness to racial and sexual prejudice-discrimination was as well articulated as it is now. The same can be said about our increased focus on gender expression (It was written before cisgender was a thing) although the number of meditations on pansexual gender sensitivity and non-dualistic transgender issues found here may have surprised you. The reason being, transgender issues attracted me through my love for Duchamp’s flamboyant and sexually subversive suggestion of the onanistic machine célibataires (bachelor machines[1]), with which he converted the principle of autoeroticism into one of the greatest masterpieces in the history of art: The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even (1915–1923). My study of his pansexual bachelor machine led me to theorize a philosophical space of transversal conceptual linkages, full of connectivity, that intersect genders. The resulting paintings were first exhibited in ec-satyricOn 2000 (2000) and then vOluptuary: an algorithmic hermaphornology (2002) at Universal Concepts Unlimited Gallery in New York City. Some have been chosen by Kimberley Palsat and used to “illustrate” the Orbis Tertius Press book.
[1] Duchamp first made reference to the machine célibataire apparatus in 1913, when he wrote notes in preparation for La mariée mise à nu par ses célibataires, même (The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, Even), also known as Le Grand Verre (The Large Glass) (1915–1923), now permanently displayed in the Arensberg Collection at the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Though well-known, The Large Glass, made of two large panes of glass, seems inexhaustible in terms of its larger meaning and thus infinitely mysterious and useful. Conceived as an eroticized corpulent machine, in Duchamp’s notes he used such terms to describe its parts: “sex cylinder,” “desire gear,” “reservoir of love gasoline,” and “general area of desire magneto.” Within the notes, Duchamp also identifies the specific bachelor machine’s component parts as: a water paddle, scissors, a chocolate grinder, a sledge, and nine malic molds. Technically, he employed a toy cannon to shoot paint-dipped matches at the glass ground of this work to determine the positions of these nine malic molds that were intended to represent nine job types, into which males are molded as men (all middle class or lower): a priest, a delivery man, a gendarme (military police), a cuirassier (cavalry soldier), a police officer, an undertaker, a go-fer sycophant, a busboy, and a railroad stationmaster.
Any prurience aroused by the title is not gratified by looking at either the bride or the bachelors, who are linked together, like a daisy chain of mechanical implements or schematic diagrams. They sit well below the looming bride (who scarcely looks naked and hardly looks female), hovering wasp-like in the upper panel, sealed off by a segmenting metal strip. In the lower Bachelor Apparatus section, Duchamp imagined these nine bachelor bootlickers cock-blocked: trapped in a chain of repetitive emotional states that flutter between hope, desire, and fear.
I find this emotional chain (or cycle) prescient, as this fearful-hopeful-yearning state has now become emblematic of Art writ large, due to the rhizomatic internet condition of art as spectacle, endlessly flowing in attention-seeking circularity. Like the net, Duchamp’s Large Glass as a mental masturbation machine contains the two great mythic spaces so often explored by western imagination: space that is rigid and forbidden—that requires a circular quest and return (for example, the trail of the Argonauts)—and the space of polymorphic confused borders, of strange affiliations, of magical spells, and of symbolic replacements (the labyrinth space of the Minotaur).
While waiting for the bride’s gratifying attention, the sexually frustrated bachelors below are enacting an enigmatic fantasy drama of competing passion (or aggression), suggested by the phrase “stripped bare” in the full title of the piece. All the bachelors hope and strive to bed the bride, but fear of vague consequences holds them back in a state of frustration, which introduces the important psychosexual function of the chocolate grinder that nearly dominates the Bachelor Apparatus zone. This important form was transferred to The Large Glass from Duchamp’s delicious painting Chocolate Grinder (No. 1) (1913). The grinding machine in the Bachelor Apparatus area signifies how the bachelors, frustrated with their inability to mate with the bride machine, may achieve some sweet satisfaction by repeatedly sexually stimulating their own genital apparatus, thus demonstrating a sort of faux dual-sexuality that can be described as the “simultaneous or successive possession of both sexes by a single individual.”
This feverish theme of onanistic dual-sexual circularity in The Large Glass presents us with a model of gender grandeur: a theoretical imaginative bisexual machine that functions independently of “the other,” thereby pulling faux dual-sexual passion into a developmental logic of its own, leading to a transcendental infinite. It is here, in the faux dual-sexual self-pleasuring chocolate grinder, where I detect some spiritual implications of the nine male types Duchamp has virtualized and sprayed into their discrete zone of remote presence. Their endless faux dual-sexual self-pleasuring (that smoothly shrivels into asexuality or explodes into pansexuality) implies two polymorphic viewpoints: those of asexual and pansexual bachelor machines. Crucial to the imaginative fantasy powers of a pansexual bachelor machine is the implementation of a theory of the variegated virtual. This theory assumes the existence of preposterous and imaginatively configured subjects able to ford human anthropocentric sexual frontiers. Duchamp’s use of post-humanist chance in the making of his bachelor machine implies that the artist relinquishes, to a greater or lesser degree, the power to close down the final interpretation of a work, i.e., keeping it open to interpretation, which facilitates all sort of imaginative and fluid mental processes in the viewer. Thus, for me, a spiritual implication of The Large Glass is the denial of sexual determinism in favour of the potency of apparent pansexual fluidity in circularity ad infinitum. This means an implicit refutation of the assumption that the “neutral” body is always white and straight and masculine. Thus, the circular implication of faux dual-sexuality has directed my focus in theorizing and coding post-bachelor hermaphrodite, artificial life, and viral art projects as early as 1992, as well as computer-robotic painting pansexual bachelor machine images, with Duchamp’s male bachelor machine as starting point.
[2] See Guattari, Félix. Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995.
Honored that the independent music magazine Psychedelic Baby has chosen my limited edition The Viral Tempest double vinyl LP (published by Pentiments records) as the vinyl of the day. An interview that Psychedelic Baby Magazine conducted with me is due to drop shortly. Thank you Pentiments & Psychedelic Baby Magazine. https://www.psychedelicbabymag.com/